Why Is Home Insurance Limited To Each And Every Different Type Of Disaster?

In: Home Insurance

14 Dec 2009




The home is either livable or NOT livable…it matters NOT what disaster ruined the home..
Why then is it that you have to pay extra for each different type of circumstance? An accident is an accident…. a disaster is a disaster… the home can only be burned, flooded, distroyed by earthquake / tornado / hurricaine ONCE.. why pay for all the different ways insurance-wise?
How covered is covered? And WHY !!!! Why?? Is it if you Never have any type of claim you aren’t refunded some of that money you spend year after year after year?
Again, once you’ve paid in insurance the amount of the home value.. what difference does it make if you replaced the home ‘money-wise’ already in insurance premiums? Why not spend those premiums on a second home instead?
Just shooting in the dark here of the many complaints I have heard ranted from my elders recently.. their solutions were hysterical.. I’d love to hear more solutions.





Related Post :


  • What type of Home Owners Insurance do we need for our San Francisco condo?
  • what type of insurance do I need? I am having my existing home demolished and having a new home built.  ?
  • What Type Of Claims Can You Submit To Your Home Insurance?
  • How The Home Insurance For Secondary Home Different From Primary Home Insurance?
  • Advantages and disadvantages of buying insurance from a local agent, compared to a national brand online

Other Post :


Sponsored

1 Response to Why Is Home Insurance Limited To Each And Every Different Type Of Disaster?

Avatar

Don,The

December 14th, 2009 at 8:20 pm

You used the words paid, pay, money, spend, and they are all correct. It is all about the money, yours specifically, and how much of it the insurance industry can get (steal).

Comment Form

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About this blog

This is about reference of insurance questions information.

Sponsored Links