Allowing people to buy across state lines. Anyone who has ever worked in the insurance industry knows that competition lowers costs because it allows for the spread of risk.
Obama’s plan which attempts to force people to buy health insurance is blatantly unconstitutional.
I’d like to see some tort reform (limits on lawsuit awards) and an assigned risk pool for people with pre-existing conditions. There’s no need to spend $849 billion to pass a couple of simple regulations.
(BTW, for anyone needing help finding a free clinic I’ve posted a link below.)
I’ll give you one that should be a no brainer along the lines of tort reform. Simply make it the default that the loser in any civil suit has to pay the legal fees of the winner. That will reduce speculative lawsuits and indirectly health care costs.
It needs to start with reforming the medical industry and what they charge the insurance companies. Have you ever looked at an itemized bill from being in the hospital and seen the outrageous charges? They charge you for an entire bottle of Tylenol for just getting 2 of them. “Transportation” charges for taking a specimen down the hall to the lab. And just for the room itself, you pay more than you would in a 5 star hotel. And you don’t get as good of service.
There are also areas in the insurance industry that needs to be cleaned up (pre-existing conditions and dropping you for a serious illness). But the insurance companies are not the only ones to blame for the mess.
The public has been duped into not seeing what the real problem is.
The REAL problem is that the cost of delivery of care (doctors, hospital care, testing, surgeries, etc) is very high. If THOSE costs were brought under control, the problem would be solved. Analogy: It costs a lot less to insure a Chevy than it does a Rolls Royce.
For that matter, if the delivery of care costs were low enough, there would be no need for insurance. You’d just pay for the care you get, when and if you get it. You’d get a tonsillectomy then write a check.
But delivery costs have been ignored. Instead, ‘insurance villains’ are the target.
Why? Because you need a villian to blame for the high costs. It is not as easy to blame doctors, nurses, and a thousand other groups which contribute to the costs.
Keep it simple–consolidate your attack toward a single villain.
Take the profit motive out and redefine the service.
Does your NYC Dr need to earn $7,500,000 a year?
Does the CEO of a non-profit hospital need to earn $1,050,000 a year
Graduate 200,000 new Dr through the military and open up 400 new VA hospitals open to anyone who wants to go.
It may become cheaper for all.
11 Responses to What health insurance reform measures would be most popular with the American electorate?
David Gunn
April 26th, 2010 at 8:12 pm
Not requiring people to buy health insurance would be a start.
J.C. Grant
April 26th, 2010 at 8:54 pm
Allowing people to buy across state lines. Anyone who has ever worked in the insurance industry knows that competition lowers costs because it allows for the spread of risk.
Obama’s plan which attempts to force people to buy health insurance is blatantly unconstitutional.
jakeb
April 26th, 2010 at 9:34 pm
Stop insurance denial, limit the amount lawyers can collect, control cost increases. Open it up nationwide to encourage competition (insurance).
Official Seal of US Republicans
April 26th, 2010 at 9:49 pm
dumping anti-trust the laws…
Adds: jakeb is correct more regulations are required.
Lag Indicator
April 26th, 2010 at 9:56 pm
I’d like to see some tort reform (limits on lawsuit awards) and an assigned risk pool for people with pre-existing conditions. There’s no need to spend $849 billion to pass a couple of simple regulations.
(BTW, for anyone needing help finding a free clinic I’ve posted a link below.)
Mr. Quarrelsome
April 26th, 2010 at 10:06 pm
I’ll give you one that should be a no brainer along the lines of tort reform. Simply make it the default that the loser in any civil suit has to pay the legal fees of the winner. That will reduce speculative lawsuits and indirectly health care costs.
gruss gott
April 26th, 2010 at 10:10 pm
Pre existing conditions and exclusions. Women of child bearing years pay more because they MIGHT have a baby, WOW, how awful of them.
Mutt
April 26th, 2010 at 10:30 pm
It needs to start with reforming the medical industry and what they charge the insurance companies. Have you ever looked at an itemized bill from being in the hospital and seen the outrageous charges? They charge you for an entire bottle of Tylenol for just getting 2 of them. “Transportation” charges for taking a specimen down the hall to the lab. And just for the room itself, you pay more than you would in a 5 star hotel. And you don’t get as good of service.
There are also areas in the insurance industry that needs to be cleaned up (pre-existing conditions and dropping you for a serious illness). But the insurance companies are not the only ones to blame for the mess.
Zebronkey
April 26th, 2010 at 10:45 pm
1) Tort reform.
2) Allow insurance companies to sell insurance across state lines.
Obama and the Democrats won’t touch those issues.
NoBama
April 26th, 2010 at 11:02 pm
The public has been duped into not seeing what the real problem is.
The REAL problem is that the cost of delivery of care (doctors, hospital care, testing, surgeries, etc) is very high. If THOSE costs were brought under control, the problem would be solved. Analogy: It costs a lot less to insure a Chevy than it does a Rolls Royce.
For that matter, if the delivery of care costs were low enough, there would be no need for insurance. You’d just pay for the care you get, when and if you get it. You’d get a tonsillectomy then write a check.
But delivery costs have been ignored. Instead, ‘insurance villains’ are the target.
Why? Because you need a villian to blame for the high costs. It is not as easy to blame doctors, nurses, and a thousand other groups which contribute to the costs.
Keep it simple–consolidate your attack toward a single villain.
Still.smiling
April 26th, 2010 at 11:58 pm
Take the profit motive out and redefine the service.
Does your NYC Dr need to earn $7,500,000 a year?
Does the CEO of a non-profit hospital need to earn $1,050,000 a year
Graduate 200,000 new Dr through the military and open up 400 new VA hospitals open to anyone who wants to go.
It may become cheaper for all.