4 Years ago the state of Michigan passed the Driver Responsibility fee. Last year the fees came into question for change as there haven’t been notable changes in driver safety or accidents.
Do you consider a fee that compounds an already made judgment cost (Tickets) as a form of double jeopardy as it puts Michigan’s citizens who are reaching all time lows in per capita income (the costs alone put those who have them in life or limb as we all need to eat)?
Currently our state representatives don’t want to put this fee on the chopping block is because of the extraordinarily large budget deficit (expected to be about 1 billion dollars to date), do you think that punishing citizens is the proper route to solve poor budget planning?
This law effects those who can’t afford the sky rocket automotive insurance rates but excludes people who violate the law in ways that put drivers in immediate danger, (wreckless driving, speeding, damaged safety equipment)?

Related Post :

Other Post :

• Workers Compensation Insurance - Workers' comp insurance rate drop proposed
• Approximately how much would hurricane/home owners insurance be west of "I"95?
• Better to Prevent Periodontal Disease Than to Have to Treat It ...
• Police Stop Driver For 15 Violations In 11 Minutes - Automotive ...
• What to look for income insurance rates